Humorously, Minimus writes:
“Marvin, must you make a series of questions on everything?? I feel like I'm at a deposition or something. If I give you "direct answers", what will you do with the responses then?? Call me a liar? Say that I'm stupid? Cross examine me? I believe the "Pharisees" were lawyers. I don't have to cross examine anyone or vice versa. Been there, done that. Very JWish. Plus, not very endearing......btw, I think I've made your thread a lot more interesting than it would've been.”
I do not make a series of questions on everything, a fact amply evidenced on this very thread of discussion.
The questions are designed to understand what you are trying to communicate by what you write on this forum, specifically on this thread of discussion. There is no need whatsoever for anyone here to answer any question asked, unless we/you want readers to actually understand what we/you are trying to say with what we/you write. On the other hand, when a prolific poster such as yourself declines to provide straightforward answers to straightforward questions directly relevant to an opinion/statement you offer, that too provides insight for understanding the veracity of opinions/statements readers are invited to consider, such as those you offer without bothering to answer forthcoming questions.
Were you to provide answers to the questions asked then, depending on how clear the responses, I would either share my view about what I understand you to be saying or else would see no need to reply and, accordingly, would not reply. This is called communication. You'll find the term in any reputable lexicon.
As for the level of interest in this discussion, it was never intended for entertainment value. It was intended for informational purposes, for those interested in the subject, which is as it should be.
The most JWish thing I can think of is to avoid answering relevant questions at all cost. This is something the WTS inculcates into as many JWs as they possibly can, and it does a pretty good job of it.
Marvin Shilmer